Box 1. Use of Diagnostic Assays during an Influenza Pandemic
Public health and clinical laboratories will use different types of diagnostic tests for influenza at different stages of a pandemic. Each of the tests discussed below is described in detail in Appendix 1.
Virus Isolation
Virus isolation—growing the viral strain in cell culture—is the “gold standard” for influenza diagnostics because it confirms that the virus is infectious. During a pandemic, virus isolation followed by antigenic and genetic (sequencing) analysis will be used to characterize the earliest pandemic isolates, as well as to monitor their evolution during the pandemic. Laboratories that participate in the WHO Global Influenza Surveillance Network typically use virus isolation followed by hemagglutination inhibition (HAI), IFA staining, or RT-PCR to monitor circulating seasonal strains of influenza. If clinical and epidemiologic data suggest that a human case of influenza might be due to infection with avian influenza A (H5N1) or another highly pathogenic avian influenza strain (see Box 3), the virus should not be cultured except under BSL-3 conditions with enhancements. Laboratories that lack BSL-3 enhanced facilities may either perform RT-PCR subtyping using BSL-2 containment procedures or send the specimen to CDC for isolation and characterization.
Immunofluorescence Antibody Staining
IFA staining following virus isolation can be used to identify influenza types (A, B) and influenza A HA subtypes using a panel of specific antisera. In some cases, IFA can be used for direct testing of cells pelleted from original clinical samples. CDC’s Influenza Branch produces and distributes a reagent kit to WHO collaborating laboratories that includes monoclonal antibodies for typing and subtyping currently circulating influenza viruses by IFA. Many laboratories use commercially available reagents to type influenza viruses by direct immunofluorescence tests (DFA).
RT-PCR Subtyping
Influenza specimens may also be typed and subtyped using RT-PCR, which does not require in vitro growth or isolation of virus. As of October 2005, CDC has trained scientists from 48 states to use RT-PCR subtyping to identify human and avian HA subtypes of public health concern. APHL members can access protocols and sequences of primers and probes that can be used for typing and subtyping on the APHL website.
Serologic Tests
Tests based on detection of antibodies in patient sera—e.g., enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), HAI, and microneutralization assay—can be used to retrospectively confirm influenza infection. Although microneutralization assay is the most comprehensive test for detection in humans of antibodies to avian influenza viruses, it is available in only a few state public health laboratories.
Rapid Diagnostic Tests
Several rapid diagnostic test kits based on antigen detection are commercially available for influenza. Laboratories in outpatient settings and hospitals can use these tests to detect influenza viruses within 30 minutes. Some tests can detect influenza A viruses (including avian strains); others can detect influenza A and B viruses without distinguishing between them, and some can distinguish between influenza A and B viruses. The type of specimens used in these tests (i.e., nasal wash/aspirate, nasopharyngeal swabs, or nasal swab or throat swab) may also vary. Like RT-PCR, rapid diagnostic tests do not require in vitro growth or isolation of virus. During a pandemic, rapid diagnostic tests will be widely used to distinguish influenza A from other respiratory illnesses. See Appendix 6 for additional information.
top of page
Appendix 1. Influenza Diagnostic Assays
Among the several types of assays used to detect influenza, rapid antigen tests, reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), viral isolation, immunofluorescence assays (IFA), and serology are the most commonly used. The sensitivity and specificity of any test for influenza will vary by the laboratory that performs the test, the type of test used, and the type of specimen tested. A chart that lists influenza diagnostic procedures and commercially available rapid diagnostic tests follows more detailed descriptions provided below.
Virus Isolation
Biocontainment level: Interpandemic and Pandemic Alert Periods – BSL-3 with enhancements; Pandemic Period – BSL-2
Virus isolation is a highly sensitive and very useful technique when the clinical specimens are of good quality and have been collected in a timely manner (optimally within 3 days of the start of illness). Isolation of a virus in cell culture along with the subsequent identification of the virus by immunologic or genetic techniques are standard methods for virus diagnosis. Virus isolation amplifies the amount of virus from the original specimen, making a sufficient quantity of virus available for further antigenic and genetic characterization and for drug-susceptibility testing if required. Virus isolation is considered the “gold standard” for diagnosis of influenza virus infections.
Highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) viruses are BSL-3 agents. During the Interpandemic and Pandemic Alert Periods, laboratories should attempt to culture HPAI viruses—as well as other influenza viruses with pandemic potential—only under BSL-3 conditions with enhancements in order to optimally reduce the risk of a novel influenza virus subtype spreading to persons or animals. During the Pandemic Period, biocontainment of BSL-2 is appropriate to prevent laboratory-acquired infection and the virus will already be widespread.
In recent years, the use of cell lines has surpassed the use of embryonated eggs for culturing of influenza viruses, although only viruses grown in embryonated eggs are used as seed viruses for vaccine production. Because standard isolation procedures require several days to yield results, they should be used in combination with the spin-amplification shell-vial method. The results of these assays can be obtained in 24–72 hours, compared to an average of 4.5 days using standard culture techniques. Spin-amplification should not be performed using 24-well plates because of increased risk of cross-contamination. The most effective combination of cell lines recommended for public health laboratories is primary rhesus monkey for standard culture, along with Madin Darby Canine Kidney (MDCK) in shell vial. The use of these two cell lines in combination has demonstrated maximum sensitivity over time for recovery of evolving influenza strains. Some clinical laboratories have recently reported good isolation rates using commercially available cell-line mixed-cell combinations; however, data are lacking on the performance of these mixed cells with new subtypes of Influenza A viruses.
Appropriate clinical specimens for virus isolation include nasal washes, nasopharyngeal aspirates, nasopharyngeal and throat swabs, tracheal aspirates, and bronchoalveolar lavage. Ideally, specimens should be collected within 72 hours of the onset of illness.
Viral culture isolates are used to provide specific information regarding circulating influenza subtypes and strains. This information is needed to compare current circulating influenza strains with vaccine strains, to guide decisions on influenza treatment and chemoprophylaxis, and to select vaccine strains for the coming year. Virus isolates also are needed to monitor the emergence of antiviral resistance and of novel influenza A subtypes that might pose a pandemic threat. During outbreaks of influenza-like illness, viral culture may help identify other causes of illness when influenza is not the etiology (except when using MDCK cells or the MDCK shell-vial technique).
Immunofluorescence Assays
Biocontainment level: BSL-2 when performed directly on clinical specimens; if used on cultures for earlier detection of virus, biocontainment recommendations for viral culture apply
Direct (DFA) or indirect (IFA) immunofluorescence antibody staining of virus-infected cells is a rapid and sensitive method for diagnosis of influenza and other viral infections. DFA and IFA can also be used to type and subtype influenza viruses using commercially available monoclonal antibodies specific for the influenza virus HA. The sensitivity of these methods is greatly influenced by the quality of the isolate, the specificity of the reagents used, and the experience of the person(s) performing, reading, and interpreting the test.
Although IFA can be used to stain smears of clinical specimens directly, when rapid diagnosis is needed it is preferable to first increase the amount of virus through growth in cell culture. For HPAI isolates, attempts to culture the virus should be made only under BSL-3 conditions with enhancements.
Reverse-Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR)
Biocontainment level: BSL-2
PCR can be used for rapid detection and subtyping of influenza viruses in respiratory specimens. Because the influenza genome consists of single-stranded RNA, a complementary DNA (cDNA) copy of the viral RNA must be synthesized using the reverse-transcriptase (RT) enzyme prior to the PCR reaction.
Laboratories can obtain CDC protocols and sequences of primers and probes for rapid RT-PCR detection of human and avian HA subtypes of current concern at the APHL website (available for members only). These protocols use real-time RT-PCR methods with fluorescent-labeled primers that allow automatic, semi-quantitative estimation of the input template. The RT-PCR results are analyzed and archived electronically, without the need for gel electrophoresis and photographic recording. A large number of samples may be analyzed at the same time, reducing the risk of carry-over contamination.
As with all PCR assays, interpretation of real-time RT-PCR tests must account for the possibility of false-negative and false-positive results. False-negative results can arise from poor sample collection or degradation of the viral RNA during shipping or storage. Application of appropriate assay controls that identify poor-quality samples (e.g., an extraction control and, if possible, an inhibition control) can help avoid most false-negative results.
The most common cause of false-positive results is contamination with previously amplified DNA. The use of real-time RT-PCR helps mitigate this problem by operating as a contained system. A more difficult problem is the cross-contamination that can occur between specimens during collection, shipping, and aliquoting in the laboratory. Use of multiple negative control samples in each assay and a well-designed plan for confirmatory testing can help ensure that laboratory contamination is detected and that negative specimens are not inappropriately identified as influenza-positive.
Specimens that test positive for a novel subtype of influenza virus should be forwarded to CDC for confirmatory testing. (Due to the possibility of contamination, it is important to provide original clinical material.) All laboratory results should be interpreted in the context of the clinical and epidemiologic information available on the patient.
Rapid Diagnostic Tests
Biocontainment level: BSL-2
Commercial rapid diagnostic tests can be used in outpatient settings to detect influenza viruses within 30 minutes. These rapid tests differ in the types of influenza viruses they can detect and in their ability to distinguish among influenza types. Different tests can 1) detect influenza A viruses only (including avian strains); 2) detect both influenza A and B viruses, without distinguishing between them; or 3) detect both influenza A and B viruses and distinguish between them.
The types of specimens acceptable for use (i.e., nasal wash/aspirate, nasopharyngeal swab, or nasal swab and throat swab) also vary by test. The specificity and, in particular, the sensitivity of rapid tests are lower than for viral culture and vary by test and specimen tested. The majority of rapid tests are >70% sensitive and >90% specific. Thus, as many as 30% of samples that would be positive for influenza by viral culture may give a negative rapid test result with these assays.
When interpreting results of a rapid influenza test, physicians should consider the level of influenza activity in the community. When influenza prevalence is low, positive rapid test results should be independently confirmed by culture or RT-PCR. When influenza is known to be circulating, clinicians should consider confirming negative tests with viral culture or other means because of the lower sensitivity of the rapid tests. Package inserts and the laboratory performing the test should be consulted for more details regarding use of rapid diagnostic tests. Additional information on diagnostic testing is provided at:
http://www.cdc.gov/flu/professionals/labdiagnosis.htm. Detailed information on the use of rapid diagnostics tests is provided in Appendix 6.
Serologic Tests
Hemagglutination Inhibition (HAI)
Biocontainment level: BSL-2
Serologic testing can be used to identify recent infections with influenza viruses. It can be used when the direct identification of influenza viruses is not feasible or possible (e.g., because clinical specimens for virus isolation cannot be obtained, cases are identified after shedding of virus has stopped, or the laboratory does not have the resources or staff to perform virus isolation).
Since most human sera contain antibodies to influenza viruses, serologic diagnosis requires demonstration of a four-fold or greater rise in antibody titer using paired acute and convalescent serum samples. HAI is the preferred diagnostic test for determining antibody rises. In general, acute-phase sera should be collected within one week of illness onset, and convalescent sera should be collected 2–3 weeks later.
There are two exceptions in which the collection of single serum samples can be helpful in the diagnosis of influenza. In investigations of outbreaks due to novel viruses, testing of single serum samples has been used to identify antibody to the novel virus. In other outbreak investigations, antibody test results from single specimens collected from persons in the convalescent phase of illness have been compared with results either from age-matched persons in the acute phase of illness or from non-ill controls. In such situations, the geometric mean titers between the two groups to a single influenza virus type or subtype can be compared. In general, these approaches are not optimal, and paired sera should be collected whenever possible.
Because HAI titers of antibodies in humans infected with avian influenza viruses are usually very low or even undetectable, more sensitive serologic tests, such as microneutralization, may be needed.
Microneutralization Assay
Biocontainment level: Interpandemic and Pandemic Alert Periods – BSL-3 with enhancements; Pandemic Period – BSL-2
The virus neutralization test is a highly sensitive and specific assay for detecting virus-specific antibody in animals and humans. The neutralization test is performed in two steps: 1) a virus-antibody reaction step, in which the virus is mixed with antibody reagents, and 2) an inoculation step, in which the mixture is inoculated into a host system (e.g. cell cultures, embryonated eggs, or animals). The absence of infectivity constitutes a positive neutralization reaction and indicates the presence of virus-specific antibodies in human or animal sera.
The virus neutralization test gives the most precise answer to the question of whether or not a person has antibodies that can neutralize the infectivity of a given virus strain. The neutralization test has several additional advantages for detecting antibody to influenza virus. First, the assay primarily detects antibodies to the influenza virus HA and thus can identify functional, strain-specific antibodies in animal and human serum. Second, since infectious virus is used, the assay can be developed quickly upon recognition of a novel virus and before suitable purified viral proteins become available for use in other assays.
The microneutralization test is a sensitive and specific assay for detecting virus-specific antibody to avian influenza A (H5N1) in human serum and potentially for detecting antibody to other avian subtypes. Microneutralization can detect H5-specific antibody in human serum at titers that cannot be detected by HAI. Because antibody to avian influenza subtypes is presumably low or absent in most human populations, single serum samples can be used to screen for the prevalence of antibody to avian viruses. However, if infection of humans with avian viruses is suspected, the testing of paired acute and convalescent sera in the microneutralization test would provide a more definitive answer regarding the occurrence of infection. Conventional neutralization tests for influenza viruses based on the inhibition of cytopathogenic effect (CPE)-formation in MDCK cell cultures are laborious and rather slow, but in combination with rapid culture assay principles the neutralization test can yield results within 2 days. For HPAI viruses, neutralization tests should be performed at BSL-3 enhanced conditions.
Quick Reference Chart of Influenza Diagnostic Tests(1) (From: Prevention and Control of Influenza: Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). MMWR 2004;53(RR-6):1-40.)
|
Procedure
|
Influenza Types Detected
|
Acceptable Specimens
|
Time for Results
|
Rapid result available
|
|
Viral culture
|
A and B
|
nasal wash/aspirate, NP swab,2 nasal aspirate, nasal swab and throat swab, sputum
|
5–10 days(3)
|
No
|
|
Immunofluorescence Antibody Staining
|
A and B
|
nasal wash/aspirate, NP swab,2 nasal aspirate, nasal swab and throat swab, sputum
|
2–4 hours
|
No
|
|
RT-PCR(5)
|
A and B
|
nasal wash/aspirate, NP swab,2 nasal aspirate, throat swab, bronchial wash, nasal aspirate, sputum
|
Hours
|
No
|
|
Serology
|
A and B
|
paired acute/convalescent serum samples(6)
|
>2 weeks
|
No
|
|
Rapid Diagnostic Tests
|
|
|
|
|
|
Directigen Flu A7 (Becton-Dickinson)
|
A
|
NP swab,2 throat swab, nasal wash, nasal aspirate
|
See insert
|
Yes
|
|
Directigen Flu A+B7, 9 (Becton-Dickinson)
|
A and B
|
NP swab,2 throat swab, nasal wash, nasal aspirate
|
See insert
|
Yes
|
|
FLU OIA7 (Thermo Electron)
|
A and B4
|
NP swab,2 throat swab, nasal aspirate, sputum
|
See insert
|
Yes
|
|
FLU OIA A/B7, 9 (Thermo Electron)
|
A and B
|
NP swab,2 throat swab, nasal aspirate, sputum
|
See insert
|
Yes
|
|
XPECT Flu A/B7, 9 (Remel)
|
A and B
|
Nasal wash, NP swab,2 throat swab
|
See insert
|
Yes
|
|
NOW Flu A Test7, 9
NOW Flu B Test7, 9 (Binax)
|
A
B
|
Nasal wash, NP swab2
Nasal wash, NP swab2
|
See insert
|
Yes
Yes
|
|
QuickVue Influenza Test8 (Quidel)
|
A and B4
|
NP swab,2 nasal wash, nasal aspirate
|
See insert
|
Yes
|
|
QuickVue Influenza A+B Test8 (Quidel)
|
A and B9
|
NP swab,2 nasal wash, nasal aspirate
|
See insert |
Yes
|
|
AS Influenza A7, 9
SAS Influenza B7, 9
|
A
B
|
NP wash,2 NP aspirate2
NP wash,2 NP aspirate2
|
See insert
|
Yes
Yes
|
|
ZstatFlu8 (ZymeTx)
|
A and B4
|
throat swab
|
See insert
|
Yes
|
Appendix 5. Guidelines for Collecting and Shipping Specimens for Influenza Diagnostics
Key Messages
-
Appropriate specimens for influenza testing vary by type of test.
-
Before collecting specimens, review the infection control precautions are described in Supplement 3.
I. Respiratory Specimens
Eight types of respiratory specimens may be collected for viral and/or bacterial diagnostics:
1) nasopharyngeal wash/aspirates, 2) nasopharyngeal swabs, 3) oropharyngeal swabs, 4) broncheoalveolar lavage, 5) tracheal aspirate, 6) pleural fluid tap, 7) sputum, and 8) autopsy specimens. Nasopharyngeal wash/aspirates are the specimen of choice for detection of most respiratory viruses and are the preferred specimen type for children aged <2 years.
Respiratory specimens for detection of most respiratory pathogens, and influenza in particular, are optimally collected within the first 3 days of the onset of illness. Before collecting specimens, review the infection control precautions in Supplement 4.
-
Collecting specimens from the upper respiratory tract
-
Nasopharyngeal wash/aspirate
-
Have the patient sit with head tilted slightly backward.
-
Instill 1 ml–1.5 ml of nonbacteriostatic saline (pH 7.0) into one nostril. Flush a plastic catheter or tubing with 2 ml–3 ml of saline. Insert the tubing into the nostril parallel to the palate. Aspirate nasopharyngeal secretions. Repeat this procedure for the other nostril.
-
Collect the specimens in sterile vials. Label each specimen container with the patient’s ID number and the date collected.
-
If shipping domestically, use cold packs to keep the sample at 4°C. If shipping internationally, pack in dry ice (see shipping instructions below).
-
Nasopharyngeal or oropharyngeal swabs
-
Use only sterile dacron or rayon swabs with plastic shafts. Do not use calcium alginate swabs or swabs with wooden sticks, as they may contain substances that inactivate some viruses and inhibit PCR testing.
-
To obtain a nasopharyngeal swab, insert a swab into the nostril parallel to the palate. Leave the swab in place for a few seconds to absorb secretions. Swab both nostrils.
-
To obtain an oropharyngeal swab, swab the posterior pharynx and tonsillar areas, avoiding the tongue.
-
Place the swabs immediately into sterile vials containing 2 ml of viral transport media. Break the applicator sticks off near the tip to permit tightening of the cap. Label each specimen container with the patient’s ID number and the date the sample was collected.
-
If shipping domestically, use cold packs to keep the sample at 4°C. If shipping internationally, pack in dry ice (see shipping instructions below).
-
Collecting specimens from the lower respiratory tract
-
Broncheoalveolar lavage, tracheal aspirate, or pleural fluid tap
-
During bronchoalveolar lavage or tracheal aspirate, use a double-tube system to maximum shielding from oropharyngeal secretions.
-
Centrifuge half of the specimen, and fix the cell pellet in formalin. Place the remaining unspun fluid in sterile vials with external caps and internal O-ring seals. If there is no internal O-ring seal, then seal tightly with the available cap and secure with Parafilm®. Label each specimen container with the patient’s ID number and the date the sample was collected.
-
If shipping domestically, use cold packs to keep the sample at 4°C. If shipping internationally, ship fixed cells at room temperature and unfixed cells frozen (see shipping instructions below).
-
Sputum
-
Educate the patient about the difference between sputum and oral secretions.
-
Have the patient rinse the mouth with water and then expectorate deep cough sputum directly into a sterile screw-cap sputum collection cup or sterile dry container.
-
If shipping domestically, use cold packs to keep the sample at 4°C. If shipping internationally, pack in dry ice (see shipping instructions below).
II. Blood Components
Both acute and convalescent serum specimens should be collected for antibody testing. Collect convalescent serum specimens 2–4 weeks after the onset of illness. To collect serum for antibody testing:
-
Collect 5 ml–10 ml of whole blood in a serum separator tube. Allow the blood to clot, centrifuge briefly, and collect all resulting sera in vials with external caps and internal O-ring seals. If there is no internal O-ring seal, then seal tightly with the available cap and secure with Parafilm®.
-
The minimum amount of serum preferred for each test is 200 microliters, which can easily be obtained from 5 ml of whole blood. A minimum of 1 cc of whole blood is needed for testing of pediatric patients. If possible, collect 1 cc in an EDTA tube and in a clotting tube. If only 1cc can be obtained, use a clotting tube.
-
Label each specimen container with the patient’s ID number and the date the specimen was collected.
-
If unfrozen and transported domestically, ship with cold packs to keep the sample at 4°C. If frozen or transported internationally, ship on dry ice.
III. Autopsy Specimens
CDC can perform immunohistochemical (IHC) staining for influenza A (H5) viruses on autopsy specimens. Viral antigens may be focal and sparsely distributed in patients with influenza, and are most frequently detected in respiratory epithelium of large airways. Larger airways (particularly primary and segmental bronchi) have the highest yield for detection of influenza viruses by IHC staining. Collection of the appropriate tissues ensures the best chance of detecting the virus by (IHC) stains.
In addition, representative tissues from major organs should be submitted for evaluation. In particular, for patients with suspected myocarditis or encephalitis, specimens should include myocardium (right and left ventricle) and CNS (cerebral cortex, basal ganglia, pons, medulla, and cerebellum). Specimens should be included from any other organ showing significant gross or microscopic pathology.
-
Specimens may be submitted as:
-
Fixed, unprocessed tissue in 10% neutral buffered formalin, or
-
Tissue blocks containing formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded specimens, or
-
Unstained sections cut at 3 microns placed on charged glass slides (10 slides per specimen)
-
Specimens should be sent at room temperature (NOT FROZEN).
-
Fresh-frozen unfixed tissue specimens may be submitted for RT-PCR.
-
Include a copy of the autopsy report (preliminary, or final if available), and a cover letter outlining a brief clinical history and the submitter’s full name, title, complete mailing address, phone, and fax numbers, in the event that CDC pathologists require further information. Referring pathologists may direct specific questions to CDC pathologists. The contact number for the Infectious Disease Pathology Activity is 404-639-3133, or the pathologists can be contacted 24 hours a day, 7 days a week through the CDC Emergency Response Hotline at 770-488-7100.
IV. Shipping Instructions
-
State and local health departments should call the CDC Emergency Response Hotline (770-488-7100) before sending specimens for influenza A reference testing. This number is available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. Hotline staff will notify a member of the Influenza Branch who will contact the health department to answer questions and provide guidance. In some cases, the state health department may arrange for a clinical laboratory to send samples directly to CDC.
-
Specimens should be sent by Priority Overnight Shipping for receipt within 24 hours. Samples (such as fresh-frozen autopsy samples for RT-PCR or other clinical materials) may be frozen at –70 if the package cannot be shipped within a specified time (e.g., if the specimen is collected on a Friday but cannot be shipped until Monday).
-
When sending clinical specimens, include the specimen inventory sheet (see below), include the assigned CDC case ID number, and note “Influenza surveillance” on all materials and specimens sent.
Include the CDC case ID number on all materials forwarded to CDC. Protocols for standard interstate shipment of etiologic agents should be followed, and are available at
http://www.cdc.gov/od/ohs/biosfty/shipregs.htm. All shipments must comply with current DOT/IATA shipping regulations.
V. Influenza Specimen Inventory Sheet
CDC Case ID:
Appendix 6. Rapid Diagnostic Testing for Influenza
The following information in this appendix is designed to assist clinicians and clinical laboratory directors in the use of rapid diagnostic tests during interpandemic influenza seasons. During an influenza pandemic, one or more of these tests may be sensitive and specific enough to be used by clinicians to supplement clinical diagnoses of pandemic influenza. However, clinicians should be reminded that a negative test result might not rule out pandemic influenza and should not affect patient management or infection control decisions.
I. INFORMATION FOR CLINICIANS
-
Background
Rapid diagnostic tests for influenza can help in the diagnosis and management of patients who present with signs and symptoms compatible with influenza. They also are useful for helping to determine whether institutional outbreaks of respiratory disease might be due to influenza. In general, rapid diagnostic testing for influenza should be done when the results will affect a clinical decision. Rapid diagnostic testing can provide results within 30 minutes.
-
Reliability and interpretation of rapid test results
The reliability of rapid diagnostic tests depends largely on the conditions under which they are used. Understanding some basic considerations can minimize being misled by false-positive or false-negative results.
Median sensitivities of rapid diagnostic tests are generally ~70%–75% when compared with viral culture, but median specificities of rapid diagnostic tests for influenza are approximately 90%–95%. False-positive (and true negative) results are more likely to occur when disease prevalence in the community is low, which is generally at the beginning and end of the influenza season. False-negative (and true positive) results are more likely to occur when disease prevalence is high in the community, which is typically at the height of the influenza season.
-
Minimizing the occurrence of false results
-
Use rapid diagnostic tests that have high sensitivity and specificity.
-
Collect specimens as early in the illness as possible (within 4–5 days of symptom onset).
-
Follow the manufacturer’s instructions, including those for handling of specimens.
-
Consider sending specimens for viral culture when:
-
Community prevalence of influenza is low and the rapid diagnostic test result is positive, or
-
Disease prevalence is high but the rapid diagnostic test result is negative.
(Contact your local or state health department for information about influenza activity.)
-
For further information
-
Information about influenza is available at the CDC influenza website (www.cdc.gov/flu) or from the CDC Flu Information Line (800-CDC-INFO [English and Spanish]; 800-243-7889 [TTY]).
-
For more information about influenza diagnostics, contact your state laboratory or state health department (http://www.cdc.gov/other.htm#states).
II. Information For Clinical Laboratory Directors
-
Background
Rapid diagnostic tests for influenza are screening tests for influenza virus infection; they can provide results within 30 minutes. The use of commercial influenza rapid diagnostic tests by laboratories and clinics has increased substantially in recent years. At least ten rapid influenza tests have been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) (see Appendix 1).
Rapid tests differ in some important respects. Some can identify influenza A and B viruses and distinguish between them; some can identify influenza A and B viruses but cannot distinguish between them. Some tests are waived from requirements under the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments of 1988 (CLIA). Most tests can be used with a variety of specimen types, but sensitivity and specificity can vary with specimen type. FDA approval is based upon specific specimen types.
Rapid tests vary in terms of sensitivity and specificity when compared with viral culture. Product insert information and research publications indicate that median sensitivities are approximately 70%–75% and median specificities are approximately 90%–95%.
Specimens to be used with rapid tests generally should be collected as close as possible to the start of symptoms and usually no more than 4–5 days later in adults. In very young children, influenza viruses can be shed for longer periods; therefore, in some instances, testing for a few days after this period may still be useful. Test sensitivity will be greatest in children, who generally have higher viral titers, if the specimen is obtained during the first 2 days of illness, and if the clinician or laboratory has more experience performing the test. The quality of the specimen tested also is critical for test sensitivity.
-
Accuracy depends on disease prevalence
The positive and negative predictive values of rapid tests vary considerably depending on the prevalence of influenza in the community. False-positive (and true negative) influenza test results are more likely to occur when disease prevalence is low, which is generally at the beginning and end of the influenza season. False-negative (and true positive) influenza test results are more likely to occur when disease prevalence is high, which is typically at the height of the influenza season.
-
Clinical considerations when influenza prevalence is low
When disease prevalence is low, the positive-predictive value (PPV) is low and false-positive test results are more likely. By contrast, the negative-predictive value (NPV) is high when disease prevalence is low, and negative results are more likely to be truly negative (see Graphs 1 and 2).
|
If flu prevalence is...
|
and specificity is...
|
then PPV is...
|
false-positive rate is...
|
|
VERY LOW (2.5%)
|
POOR (80%)
|
V POOR (6%–12%)
|
V. HIGH (88%–94%)
|
|
VERY LOW (2.5%)
|
GOOD (98%)
|
POOR (39%–56%)
|
HIGH (44%–61%)
|
|
MODERATE (20%)
|
POOR (80%)
|
POOR (38%–56%)
|
HIGH (44%–62%)
|
|
MODERATE (20%)
|
GOOD (98%)
|
GOOD (86%–93%)
|
LOW (7%–14%)
|
Interpretation of positive results should take into account the clinical characteristics of the case-patient. If an important clinical decision is affected by the test result, the rapid test result should be confirmed by another test, such as viral culture or PCR.
-
Clinical considerations when influenza prevalence is high
When disease prevalence is relatively high, the NPV is low and false-negative test results are more likely. By contrast, when disease prevalence is high, the PPV is high and positive results are more likely to be true (see Graph 2).
|
If flu prevalence is…
|
and sensitivity is…
|
then NPV is…
|
false-negative rate is…
|
|
MODERATE (20%)
|
POOR (50%)
|
MODERATE (86%–89%)
|
MODERATE (11%–14%)
|
|
MODERATE (20%)
|
HIGH (90%)
|
V. GOOD (97%–99%)
|
V. LOW (2%–3%)
|
|
HIGH (40%)
|
POOR (50%)
|
MODERATE (70%–75%)
|
MODERATE (25%–30%)
|
|
HIGH (40%)
|
HIGH (90%)
|
V. GOOD (93%–94%)
|
LOW (6%–7%)
|
Interpretation of negative results should take into account the clinical characteristics of the case-patient. If an important clinical decision is affected by the test result, the rapid test result should be confirmed by another test, such as viral culture or PCR.
-
Selecting tests
Selection of a test should take into consideration several factors, such as the types of specimens that are considered optimal for that test. Also, tests with high sensitivity and specificity will provide better positive and negative predictive values. Information about test characteristics is provided in product inserts and scientific articles and by the manufacturer.
-
Changes in recommended procedures can affect test results
Modification by the user can affect test performances and increase false-positive and/or false-negative rates. Such modifications include using specimens for which the test is not optimized or using swabs that did not come with the rapid test kit (unless recommended).
-
When are rapid diagnostic tests beneficial?
Use of rapid diagnostic tests are beneficial in these situations:
-
To test cases during an outbreak of acute respiratory disease to determine if influenza is the cause, or
-
To test selected patients during the influenza season, or
-
In the fall or winter, to test selected patients presenting with respiratory illnesses compatible with influenza to help establish whether influenza is present in a specific population and to guide healthcare providers in diagnosing and treating respiratory illnesses.
In general, the exclusive use of rapid tests does not address the public health need for obtaining viral isolates so that influenza virus strain subtyping and characterization can be conducted to monitor antigenic and genetic changes.
During an influenza pandemic, some rapid diagnostic tests may be able to detect the pandemic strain with adequate sensitivity and specificity. Rapid tests can be used by physicians to supplement clinical diagnoses of pandemic influenza.
Physicians should be reminded that a negative test result might not rule out influenza and should not affect patient management or infection control decisions.
-
For further information
Information on influenza diagnostics is provided on the CDC website at: http://www.cdc.gov/flu/professionals/labdiagnosis.htm.

